[ad_1]
With the rising tide of fake news on social media platforms, the debate over how much control a government should have on online information is a perennial one.
In Vietnam, the government is intensifying its control over the internet regime. The country is formulating new rules to control news dissemination on social media platforms that operate in the country, Reuters reported citing sources.
The decision, according to Reuters, results from the government’s concerns over users mistaking social media accounts for authorized news outlets.
While citizens might want the government to boot genuinely misleading information, the risk of more regulatory oversight is a loss of freedom by the people.
Vietnam already has one of the world’s most restrictive internet governance regimes and was given an “internet freedom score” of 22 out of 100 by the pro-democracy non-profit Freedom House. That makes its internet freedom worse than that of Russia (30/100) and Saudi Arabia (24/100).
The authorities are also weighing new rules that would ask social media platforms to remove content that is illegal or deemed to harm national security, according to Reuters.
The approach would put the burden on the likes of Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and popular domestic messager Zalo to purge content unwanted by the authorities.
Vietnam’s restriction on news dissemination is reminiscent of a recent move by China to crack down on unauthorized news publishers. Last year, Beijing said social media accounts posting news must hold the relevant media licenses. Media accreditation in China is almost exclusively reserved for state-owned outlets, meaning the millions of content creators would have to shun all things newsworthy.
Indeed, some have likened Vietnam’s grip over the internet to China’s censorship model. When Vietnam rolled out its cybersecurity law in 2021, many saw the Southeast Asian country as following in China’s footsteps.
For example, the law requires foreign tech giants like Facebook and Google to store user data locally and allows the government to block access to content that could be defined as dangerous to national security, similar to policies implemented in China.
More to come…
[ad_2]
